SITE MAP

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SEARCH

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SHORTCUT:


 

MSRI's 25th Anniversary Celebration

January 26, 2008 to January 30, 2008
Organized By: Alejandro Adem, Isadore Singer, and Robert Bryant.
 
Return to Workshop Description
 

Murphy's Law in algebraic geometry: Badly-behaved moduli spaces

Sunday January 27, 2008

02:00PM - 03:00PM

Speakers:
Ravi Vakil

Abstract:

We consider the question: ``How bad can the deformation space of an
object be?'' (Alternatively: ``What singularities can appear on a
moduli space?'') The answer seems to be: ``Unless there is some a
priori reason otherwise, the deformation space can be arbitrarily
bad.'' We show this for a number of important moduli spaces.


More precisely, up to smooth parameters, every singularity that can be
described by equations with integer coefficients appears on moduli
spaces parameterizing: smooth projective surfaces (or
higher-dimensional manifolds); smooth curves in projective space (the
space of stable maps, or the Hilbert scheme); plane curves with nodes
and cusps; stable sheaves; isolated threefold singularities; and more.
The objects themselves are not pathological, and are in fact as nice
as can be. This justifies Mumford's philosophy that even moduli
spaces of well-behaved objects should be arbitrarily bad unless there
is an a priori reason otherwise.


I will begin by telling you what ``moduli spaces'' and ``deformation
spaces'' are. The complex-minded listener can work in the holomorphic
category; the arithmetic listener can think in mixed or positive
characteristic. This talk is intended to be (mostly) comprehensible
to a broad audience.

[Ravi Vakil]
Want to be kept updated on upcoming events? Then Click Here to Subscribe to Our Newsletters!